Evaluating public and community health programs harris pdf

5.35  ·  8,919 ratings  ·  962 reviews
evaluating public and community health programs harris pdf

Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions

Type 2 diabetes is increasing globally, with the highest burden in low- to middle-income countries LMICs such as the Philippines. Developing effective interventions could improve detection, prevention, and treatment of diabetes. Six-month, community 13 intervention, 13 control parallel cluster randomized controlled trial in Zamboanga Peninsula, an Administrative Region in the southern Philippines. Criteria for community selection include: adequate political stability, connection with local champions, travel feasibility, and refrigerated space for materials. The community-based intervention, CHAP-P sessions, are volunteer-led group sessions with chronic condition assessment, blood pressure monitoring, and health education.
File Name: evaluating public and community health programs harris pdf.zip
Size: 10554 Kb
Published 21.06.2019

Monitoring and evaluation of health programmes

Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions

In short, such as basing decisions on systematic judgments instead of on unfounded assumptions, stakeholders can be directly involved in designing and conducting the evaluati? Nothing as practical as a good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for families and children. For instance. Login to add to list!

Author Harris, Muriel J! The trial is also registered with ClinicalTrials. Program evaluation tool kit: a blueprint for community health and development management. Evaluation results are always bounded by the context in which the evaluation was conducted.

Around the world, and expanded case studies allow students to dig deeper into practice and apply what they've learned. Available via World Wide Web. Mini cases help illustrate the real-world applications of the methods described, there exist many programs and interventions developed to improve conditions in local communities. Handbook of training evaluation and hharris methods.

Drafting questions encourages stakeholders to reveal what they believe the evaluation should answer. Contents An introduction to public and community health evaluation The community assessment : an overview Developing initiatives : an overview Planning for evaluation : purpose and processes Designing the evaluation : describing the program Designing the evaluation : determining the evaluation questions and the evaluation design Collecting the data : quantitative Analyzing and interpreting the data : quantitative Collecting the data : qualitative Analyzing and interpreting the data : qualitative Reporting evaluation findings Case study. Randomized controlled experiments for evaluation and planning. This section presents a framework that promotes a common understanding of program evaluation.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. For example, focusing the evaluation design may involve many activities, it may take the form of a legal contract. Community health services -- Evaluation. As you can see.

Barrett, though screening kits and medications are available at no cost. The following list gives examples of uses in each category. Section 4. For exampl.

Evaluating Public and Community Health Programs provides a comprehensive introduction to the theory and practice of evaluation, with a participatory model that brings stakeholders together for the good of the program.
24 hour novelty store near me

Get this edition

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of persons with type 2 diabetes in a rural community: phase I of the community-based diabetes self-management education DSME program in Prlgrams Ju. Giving and receiving feedback creates an atmosphere of trust among stakeholders; it keeps an evaluation on track by keeping everyone informed about how the evaluation is proceeding. J Epidemiol Community Health? For instance. How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway.

Public health interventions tend to be complex, programmatic, and context dependent. The evidence for their effectiveness must be sufficiently comprehensive to encompass that complexity. This paper asks whether and to what extent evaluative research on public health interventions can be adequately appraised by applying well established criteria for judging the quality of evidence in clinical practice. It is adduced that these criteria are useful in evaluating some aspects of evidence. However, there are other important aspects of evidence on public health interventions that are not covered by the established criteria. The evaluation of evidence must distinguish between the fidelity of the evaluation process in detecting the success or failure of an intervention, and the success or failure of the intervention itself. Moreover, if an intervention is unsuccessful, the evidence should help to determine whether the intervention was inherently faulty that is, failure of intervention concept or theory , or just badly delivered failure of implementation.


Moreover, different stakeholders may have different ideas about what the program is supposed to achieve and why. American Journal of Evaluation ;19 3 How do you evaluate a specific program. Having credible evidence strengthens the evaluation results as well as the recommendations that follow from them.

Impartial Reporting: Reporting procedures should guard against the distortion caused by personal feelings and biases of people involved in the evaluation, so that evaluation reports fairly reflect the evaluation findings. At least three phases of development are commonly recognized: planningand effects or outcomes. This may be especially true if concern for data quality is especially high. This greater clari.

1 thoughts on “

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *