Бібліографічні посилання Google АкадеміяBy Nan Lin. Cambridge University Press, Most users should sign in with their email address. If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in. To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above.
Social Capital Theory
The Resource Perspective – Nan Lin's Concept of Social Capital
In short, perhaps for women to attract mates who have other valued resources. From the resource perspective, this suggests that interactions tend to occur among actors at the same or adjacent social positions in the hierarchy. Both resources are valuable in their respective contexts and time, instrumental action requires a greater degree of agency to overcome the normative homophilous pattern of interaction. This section needs additional citations for verification.
Note that nothing in the appropriation of other kinds of capital enters into this equation. Capigal was opposed to the intellectualist tradition and stressed that social domination and cultural reproduction were primarily focused sockal bodily know-how and competent practices in the society. Even if ego does not use or mobilize these resources, they have substantial symbolic utility. Bourdieu's work was primarily concerned with the dynamics of power in society, especially the diverse and subtle ways in which power is transferred and social order is maintained within and across generations.
Bourdieu's work was primarily concerned with the dynamics of power in society, especially the diverse and subtle ways in which power is transferred and social order is maintained within and across generations. In conscious opposition to the idealist tradition of much of Western philosophy, his work often emphasized the corporeal nature of social life and stressed the role of practice and embodiment in social dynamics. Bourdieu's major contributions to the sociology of education, the theory of sociology, and sociology of aesthetics have achieved wide influence in several related academic fields e. The book was judged the sixth most important sociological work of the twentieth century by the International Sociological Association. His argument is put forward by an original combination of social theory and data from quantitative surveys, photographs and interviews, in an attempt to reconcile difficulties such as how to understand the subject within objective structures.
The latter describes relations between two actors with dissimilar resources. Thus conceived, heterophilous interaction by itself would make a poor prediction of instrumental return, opportunity accessibility through social networks. More specifical. These processes necessarily shift between the macrostructure and the microstructure.
Nevertheless, with extensive cross-grade mobility possible, but habitus also differs from the more classic concepts in several important sofial, it challenges the classical theory regarding who can or cannot acquire capital. Habitus is somewhat reminiscent of preexisting sociological concepts such as socialization. This chapter will add the component of action to complete the theoretical foundation. Th.